Saturday, 30 January 2016

Post-colonialism

Post-colonialism: blog task
1) List FIVE films, FIVE TV programmes and FIVE online-only productions that are discussed in the article.

Films:
  • Anuvahood
  • Kidulthood
  • Shank
  • Attack on the block
  • The mirror boy

TV programmes:

  • Fresh prince of bell-air
  • 3 Non-Blonde
  • The real mcoy
  • Luther
  • Casualty

Online- Only: 

  • Venus vs Mars
  • The Ryan Sisters
  • Brother with no game
  • Meet the abdenanjos 
  • All about the Mckenzies



3) Watch Destiny Ekaragha's clips above (more of her work is available onher website, including the short film The Park). To what extent can we apply Alvarado's and Fanon's theories to these films? Do they reinforce or subvert typical black stereotypes in British film and TV? Refer to specific scenes and events in the clips in answering this question and aim for at least 350 words.


In the first clip, Gone too Far, the representation of the brother coming to London from Nigeria fit the stereotypical persona that people would expect. Alvarado's category of 'humorous' would definitely be applicable to this character as seen in the end of trailer, he is seen singing whilst eating his chicken. By the restaurant owner laughing, it echoes and accentuates the humour that is seen by the audience. Additionally, Alvarado's category of 'exotic' and Fanons 'primitivize' would also be applicable as seen through the mise-en-scene, specifically the costume of the mother. Throughout the trailer, the mother is dressed in a traditional African dress. By wearing something that wouldn't normally be worn in England, it would present the mother as 'exotic'. Furthering this, the brother and mother speak with a stereotypical  African accent which also solidifies this reading of 'exotic'. In addition to Fanon's 'primitvize', the scene where the protagonist is playing football would coincide with the representation of 'sporting prowess'. According to the trailer, it can be interpreted that it is reinforcing stereotypes associated with Afrcian culture. However, the representation is more playful and seen  as somehow embracing Arfican roots and culture. In Ekaragha's short film 'Skinny Jeans', Alvarado's category of 'humorous' is seen through the dialogue between the three characters seen in sat. The fact that the characters are so naive to the truth makes their conversation all the more trivial thus accentuating the stereotype of humourous. However, with the costume, the representation is interesting. This is because although the characters are wearing hoodies, which would be assossiated with Alvarado's 'dangerous' through the connotations of a reckless youth. But through the use of bright colours, blue and red, it would create alternative connotations and thus changing the representation. Ultimately, Ekaragha's 'Skinny Jeans' reinforces stereotypes in African culture, however also challenging stereotypes especially in therms of gang culture and African youth.

Friday, 15 January 2016

Identities and the Media: Reading the riots

  1. How did the language and selection of images in the coverage create a particular representation of young people? The use of language, 'riots' rather than 'uprisings' or 'protests' immediately creates connotations of mindless, barbaric behaviour. Furthermore, in majority of images used include fire, police geared with riot uniform and youths dressed in tracksuits and hoodies. The images of the fire imitates images that are generally seen in warzones. Also, the way in which the police are represented in pictures portray them in the light as the protectors against the 'mindless youth' rioting and causing mayhem.   
  2. Why does David Buckingham mention Owen Jones and his work Chavs: the demonisation of the working class? In Jones' work 'Chavs', he discuss the new form of class contempt. This is where the working class, is argued, to have become an object of 'fear and ridicule'. This isn't just seen in the news industry, but also seen elsewhere in popular figures like Little Britain's 'Vicky Pollard' and Cathrine Tate's 'Am I bovvered'. 
  3. What is the typical representation of young people – and teenage boys in particular? What did the 2005 IPSOS/MORI survey find? 40% newspaper articles featuring young people focused on violence, crime or anti-social behaviour. 71% could be described as having a negative tone.
  4. How can Stanley Cohen’s work on Moral Panic be linked to the coverage of the riots? Stan Cohen says that the media play a role in ‘deviance amplification’: in reporting the phenomenon, and in expressing the fear and outrage of ‘respectable society’, they make it more attractive to those who might not otherwise have thought about becoming involved. Media stereotypes are never simply inaccurate: they always contain a ‘grain of truth’. Yet in this case, the media coverage can be seen to reflect a much more general fear of young people, and especially of working-class young people
  5. What elements of the media and popular culture were blamed for the riots? Much of the initial blame for the violencewas put on popular culture: it was rap music, violent computer games or reality TV that was somehow provoking young people to go out and start rioting.
  6. How was social media blamed for the riots? What was interesting about the discussion of social media when compared to the Arab Spring in 2011? Despite being depicted by tabloids as mindless thugs and morons, the rioters were also seen as somehow skilful enough to co-ordinate their actions by using Facebook, Blackberry and Twitter. According to The Telegraph:technology fuelled Britain’s first 21st century riot. The Tottenham riots were orchestrated by teenage gang members, who used the latest mobile phone technology to incite and film the looting and violence. 
  7. The riots generated a huge amount of comment and opinion - both in mainstream and social media. How can the two-step flow theory be linked to the coverage of the riots? Different people – politicians,community leaders, media commentators, ‘experts’ – offer different accounts of what is happening; although they often receive most attention if they can come up with simple explanations, and propose simple solutions. Yet how they do this often reflects their own social or political interests: the issue becomes an opportunity for them to make broader points, and to promote their own views.
  8. Alternatively, how might media scholars like Henry Jenkins view the 'tsunami' of blogs, forums and social media comments? Do you agree that this shows the democratisation of the media? system. They argue that theage of ‘Big Media’ – of powerful, centralised corporations controlling media – is now finished: hierarchical, top-down communications have been replaced by a more egalitarian approach.
  9. What were the right-wing responses to the causes of the riots? Too much permissiveness, he argues, has bred a generation of young people with no respect for their elders and betters, and no ‘moral compass’. Working-class youth – apparently live lives of ‘absolute futility. He also says 'They are essentially wild beasts.'
  10. What were the left-wing responses to the causes of the riots? They argue that it was unsurprising that most of the disturbances erupted in areas with high levels of poverty and deprivation – and, they point out, it was tragic that these communities also bore the brunt of the damage.
  11. How can capitalism be blamed for the riots? What media theory (from our new/digital media unit) can this be linked to? British society has become acceptable for our politicians to lie and to cheat... the sad young men and women, without hope or aspiration, have caused such mayhem and chaos over the past few days. They are just following the example set by senior and respected figures in society.
  12. Were people involved in the riots given a voice in the media to explain their participation? On all sides of the media debate, there was rush to instant judgment – or at least instant opinion. No, people for example Tudor historian Professor David Starkey tried to explain, talking about how ‘the chavs, the whites are now black’, and about gangsta rap – a topic on which he clearly knew nothing at all.    
  13. In the Guardian website's investigation into the causes of the riots, they did interview rioters themselves. Read this Guardian article from their Reading the Riots academic research project - what causes are outlined by those involved in the disturbances? Anger and frustration at the way police engage with communities was a significant cause of the summer riots in every major city where disorder took place. Interviews with people who took part in the disturbances which spread across England in August revealed deep-seated and sometimes visceral antipathy towards police.  Many rioters conceded that their involvement in looting was simply down to opportunism, saying that a perceived suspension of normal rules presented them with an opportunity to acquire goods and luxury items they could not ordinarily afford. Rioters identified a range of political grievances, but at the heart of their complaints was a pervasive sense of injustice. For some this was economic: the lack of money, jobs or opportunity. For others it was more broadly social: how they felt they were treated compared with others.   
  14. What is your own opinion on the riots? Do you have sympathy with those involved or do you believe strong prison sentences are the right approach to prevent such events happening in future? I have sympathy for the people punished for rioting for the reason of feeling that the government are treating them unjust. This is because it is a way that they feel that they will get the attention that they deserve and a means of which that they are able to get some sort of equality. Although it became very barbaric and violent, if equality was in place initially, the events wouldn't have happened in the first place. Also, I think that the riots escalated to such a high degree because it was anger that was bottled up by the youth. If the youth were given a fair share, or at least shown to be cared for, the events wouldn't have escalated to such a high degree. Ultimately, a strong prison sentence would deter participants, however the right way of preventing a repeat would to establish a good relationship with the youth. To give them a share of equality and a means to speak out.  

NDM News

Twitter sued for enabling Isis by family of shooting victim


Twitter is being sued by the family of a soldier killed in an Isis shooting who claims the network hasn’t done enough about the spread of the group. Like the rest of the large social networks, Twitter has been under scrutiny as a place that Isis is using to recruit people online. A range of accounts use the site to spread propaganda and other information. The family of Lloyd “Carl” Fields Jr, who was killed in an attack in Amman in Jordan last year, claim that the shooting might never have happened if Twitter didn’t exist. The complaint claims that Twitter is aware of Isis users on its platform and lets them continue to use it. “While we believe the lawsuit is without merit, we are deeply saddened to hear of this family's terrible loss. Like people around the world, we are horrified by the atrocities perpetrated by extremist groups and their ripple effects on the Internet,” a Twitter spokesperson said.
A lot of users were angry at Twitter's unexpected experiment
Twitter responds:
“Violent threats and the promotion of terrorism deserve no place on Twitter and, like other social networks, our rules make that clear. The company’s transparency report says that it complied with 42 per cent of just over 1,000 content removal requests in the first half of last year.

Privacy concerns dismissed by European court of human rights after Romanian engineer fired for using Yahoo Messenger to communicate with fiancee. The European court of human rights (ECHR) dismissed the engineer’s argument that the company had violated his right to confidential correspondence. 
Two people exchanging information via smartphone
The court said it was not “unreasonable that an employer would want to verify that employees were completing their professional tasks during working hours”, adding that the company had accessed the messages in the belief they contained professional communications. The judges also defended the decision by Romania’s courts to allow transcripts of the engineer’s communications be used against him in court, saying: “It proved that he had used the company’s computer for his own private purposes during working hours.”


Friday, 8 January 2016

NDM News

Netflix expands into 130 new countries, making it available almost everywhere in the world


Netflix is now available almost everywhere after it rolled out in 130 new countries — with one big exception. The company is still not available in China, which is the last big country to hold out on the online TV and film streaming service. With this launch, consumers around the world — from Singapore to St Petersburg, from San Francisco to Sao Paulo — will be able to enjoy TV shows and movies simultaneously - no more waiting," said Mr Hastings. "With the help of the internet, we are putting power in consumers' hands to watch whenever, wherever and on whatever device." The site announced at the gadget show in Las Vegas that it now shows 125 million hours of TV and films per day, and that 12 billion hours of video was streamed in the last three months of 2015. That is up nearly 50 per cent on the same period next year.

This shows how globalisation is taking form in terms of movie streaming. By Netflix being available worldwide, it could show that western culture would affecting and influencing other culture worldwide.   

Forget the media gloom of shrinking circulations, shrivelling revenues, blocked ads and all the woes of change and upheaval. There are reasons – modest but instructive reasons – to be cheerful: good things from 2015 set to get better in 2016. One thing is the price that quality still commands. An old, distressingly pink newspaper, founded in 1888: that would be £844m of Nikkei’s money for the Financial Times. And an even older – 1843 – news magazine founded to fight for the repeal of the Corn Laws: that would be £469m for a mere 50% of Economist action. Two fine, seasoned brands turning a profit and moving to grow digitally as well as in print.

Did television kill the movies? Not when the Force awakens and breaks historic box office receipts. Did Kindles kill the printed book? Will galloping technology click away the need to discover and understand? No: the mix churns and evolves. Something old, something new: and something constantly human operating just off screen. Which is why, perhaps, the Guardian and Observer refugee appeal, topping £2m and breaking all past records, is the most cheering, brand perfect thing of the lot.


Friday, 11 December 2015

NDM News

Amazon shows off new prototype delivery drone


Amazon has launched a video showing off its new prototype drone, an unmanned aerial vehicle which can get packages to customers within 30 minutes. This particular drone is a hybrid vehicle— part helicopter and part airplane. "This design enables it to fly long distances efficiently and go straight up and down in a safe, agile way," says Kristen Kish, Amazon Prime Air's spokesperson. According to the video, the autonomous drone - which weighs under 55 pounds - rises vertically like a helicopter to a height of 400 feet, and then flies horizontally for upto 15 miles. The launch date remains unknown, but according to the new Prime Air microsite, the drones are being developed in the United States, the United Kingdom and Israel and being tested in "multiple international locations."


This article shows how reality is becoming more instant, even in terms of delivery. Through these developments with the droid, it shows how immediacy is becoming ever more predominant and is being seen as a necessity as people are becoming more and more preoccupied in getting the next the 'big thing'. Also, it shows how people are becoming more dependant on machines and technology which has its advantages for example, there is less room for human error, but also has its disadvantages, the loss of jobs.       
A BBC journalist has been suspended by the corporation after stating he was “ashamed” that his employer had invited the boxer Tyson Fury to its Sports Personality Of The Year show. The gay English-born Northern Ireland-based journalist has said he has written to the BBC director general, Tony Hall, over Fury’s nomination. Hall is expected to be questioned about Fury’s nomination by the culture, media and sport select committee next week.
In his online post, West wrote: “My employer is hurting me and other gay people by celebrating someone who considers me no better than a paedophile and who believes homosexual people are helping to bring about the end of the world.
Tyson Fury was a late addition to the Sports Personality of the Year shortlist.
This exemplifies the discrimination that is amongst the gay community but through West posting his concerns online it suspended him because he begins to criticise how the BBC aren't brave enough to admit a mistake. By Tyson Furry being nominated to be the BBC's sports personality of the year but being sexist, it caused West to express his views about being ashamed about working in the BBC. Also, it shows the illusion of freedom of speech as he was suspended for expressing his agitations.    

Monday, 7 December 2015

Globalisation and the media: wider issues

1) Why was Google Glass controversial? 

"The main concerns with the advent of Glass however relate to issues of privacy. If people using Glass are effectively able to walk around and film everything that they’re looking at, how are the public to know if they’re being filmed without having given their permission?"

The main issue of the google glasses is seen through the aspect of privacy. People could be filmed or photographed without their permission or even worse, their knowledge. 

2) What are the positive elements to Globalisation that the article highlights?

"In a sense the world becomes more accessible, and people are enriched by getting to know and understand it better."

"Increased choice and opportunities empower people, while access to information can enhance not only the ability to make informed decisions but even the democratic process."

Positive elements of globalisation is seen as people are able to access the internet even easier and to a higher degree with the glasses. Through the connectivity, the world is made 'smaller' and more accessible for people. 

3) What are potential negatives to Globalisation?

"the general populace alienated from each other and hooked up to a host of machines controlled by a large and powerful unseen source."

A negative however is that although people are connected online, in reality people are alienated from one another, that people are too preoccupied on being connected online that the cyber world has become their way of life, their reality.    

4) What is a techno-panic? How does it link to moral panics?

"a techno-panic is therefore a moral panic that centres on fears regarding specific contemporary technology or technological activity. Some of the dialogue regarding Glass and its release could be viewed as both moral and techno-panics."

Moral panic is a highlighting of concerns in society stirred up by the media in regards to an event in society an a techno-panic is a moral panic specifically based from contemporary technology or technological activity. 
5) What is your opinion on the privacy debate and major corporations being able to access large quantities of personal data?

In my opinion, major corporations having large quantities of personal data is distressing as it shows the lack of security that we have online. Furthermore, by major corporations knowing so much about people, it worried people because users generally think that being online is safe and secure through the privacy function. As technology is such an essential part of peoples lives, it puts to question that if they aren't secure online, how much more in the real world.    

NDM News


Is mobile making media all the same?

The mobile phone, it turns out, is the greatest homogenising force the media has ever seen. In terms of design: with every pixel precious, sites converged pretty quickly to the format we all now know so well – large photos, clean single-column text on a plain white background, a sticky element at the top of the screen that allegedly allows users to navigate the site but which in practice is mostly just used for branding and/or advertising.

 In the mid-2000s, especially, the dream of web-based nanopublishing was alive and well: if “freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one,” as AJ Liebling famously said, then suddenly hundreds of millions of people had a printing press at their fingertips. Arianna Huffington, and her investors, made a small fortune from aggregating what those people had to say: “self expression is the new entertainment,” she said, and she wasn’t wrong.

News content has beome increasingly aimed at mobile, especially Facebook

This article show how the mobile is the medium for homogenising the media. This is very interesting because the advancing in technology would have meant that institutions are able to create a sense of individuality but through mobile apps, it is very difficult because users are so used to certain layouts. This shows how there is a lack of individuality in the media because majority of institutions have their app constructed in a very familiar way in which all the other apps are constructed too.    





Globalisation in advertising weakens great British brands, says Sir John Hegarty


Globalisation in advertising is weakening the brand reputation of Cadbury and other great British names, one of the leading figures in British adland claims. “Globalisation has made it hard,” he said. “I have to create a piece of communication that works not only in the UK but in Malaysia, in Germany...and all the vested interests are hard to convince.” “Cadbury's was a culturally important brand, it was part of the British psyche. It’s now completely disappeared. It had a history of wonderful advertising right up until Cadbury's Gorilla and then [the company] it gets taken over by Kraft who reduced the country's association and relationship with it and have turned it into a very ordinary chocolate in terms of image, in my view,” he said. 



This article is interesting because it debates on the negative effects of globalisation on stereotypically 'British' brands mainly Cadbury. This is because these brands have to find ways to make their advertising appealing internationally not just nationally which was the case in the previous years. This article taps into the notion of the 'global village' because adverts are now being tweaked in order to find appeal internationally or else the institution who don't, are losing their competitiveness.